{"id":78230,"date":"2024-03-29T08:47:55","date_gmt":"2024-03-29T13:47:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tigermedianet.com\/?p=78230"},"modified":"2024-03-29T08:47:57","modified_gmt":"2024-03-29T13:47:57","slug":"prince-of-persia-warrior-within-excellent-sequel-needles-makeover","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tigermedianet.com\/?p=78230","title":{"rendered":"Prince of Persia: Warrior Within – Excellent sequel, needles makeover"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By NICK McCOY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tiger Media Network<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A while back, I talked about \u201cPrince of Persia: The Sands of Time,\u201d<\/a> a 2003 action-adventure title which, by all accounts, I consider a near masterpiece and an amazing title in the genre. From its entertaining story, memorable protagonist, and phenomenal gameplay, it is a game that truly stands the test of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n


With the success of \u201cThe Sands of Time\u201d and the revival of the \u201cPrince of Persia\u201d series as a whole, Ubisoft inevitably created a sequel, coming out with \u201cPrince of Persia: Warrior Within\u201d just one year later. This entry saw a major change in direction, sporting a darker, grittier tone and a more brooding Prince. While still highly acclaimed and considered by many fans the best entry in the trilogy, its incredibly gritty tone was a source of contention for many. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

As for my thoughts, \u201cPrince of Persia: Warrior Within\u201d is a phenomenal follow-up to a classic game, building on the foundations of \u201cThe Sands of Time\u201d and even drastically improving in some areas. However, its change from a light-hearted action adventure to a mature, edgy title is not something I entirely jive with. While there are changes I do quite enjoy, for the most part, I find the new aesthetic completely needless and a true time capsule of its era. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Release: <\/p>\n\n\n\n